2002 Scorecard Vote

Trade and Environment
House Roll Call Vote 370
Issue: Other

As trade has become an increasingly vital component of the global economy, important policy decisions on such issues as marine species conservation and sustainable forestry practices are increasingly being made in the context of international trade agreements and institutions. These bodies often fail to incorporate environmental concerns in their decisions and have, in some cases, rejected environmental and public health protections as barriers to trade.

This issue came to a head during the House debate over "Fast Track" trade legislation. Fast Track authority allows the President to negotiate trade agreements with expedited procedures for approval or disapproval by Congress. Congress agrees to consider the trade agreements under a procedure with mandatory deadlines, no amendments, limited debate, and an up-or-down vote. In exchange, Congress is permitted to set negotiating objectives, conditions for approving agreements, and guidelines for any changes to domestic law.

Fast Track authority lapsed in 1994. The environmental community supports a consensus-based Fast Track authority that would encourage environmental protection and guard against weakening environmental standards while still promoting economic growth. Such was not the case with the Trade Act of 2002 (H.R. 3009), which was opposed by conservationists for failing to address key environmental provisions in a meaningful manner and for failing to encourage real environmental progress and cooperation with trading partners. The bill also failed to ensure that provisions such as Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which grant foreign corporations broad powers to sue U.S. taxpayers for damages if U.S. environmental, health or land protection laws interfere with the corporations' business, are not included in future trade deals.

On July 27, 2002, the House adopted the H.R. 3009 conference report by a 215-212 vote (House roll call vote 370). NO is the pro-environment vote. The bill was adopted by the Senate on August 1, 2002, and signed into law by President Bush the next day.

is the
pro-environment position
Votes For: 215  
Votes Against: 212  
Not Voting: 7  
Pro-environment vote
Anti-environment vote
Missed vote
Not applicable
Representative Party District Vote
Riley, BobRAL-03 
Young, DonRAK-AL 
Flake, JeffRAZ-01 
Pastor, EdDAZ-02 
Ross, MikeDAR-04 
Ose, DougRCA-03 
Lantos, TomDCA-12 
Stark, PeteDCA-13 
Honda, MikeDCA-15 
Lofgren, ZoeDCA-16 
Farr, SamDCA-17 
Condit, GaryDCA-18 
Capps, LoisDCA-22 
Harman, JaneDCA-36 
Royce, EdRCA-39 
Lewis, JerryRCA-40 
Baca, JoeDCA-42 
Filner, BobDCA-50 
Hefley, JoelRCO-05 
Castle, MikeRDE-AL 
Miller, JeffRFL-01 
Boyd, AllenDFL-02 
Keller, RicRFL-08 
Davis, JamesDFL-11 
Miller, DanRFL-13 
Foley, MarkRFL-16 
Meek, CarrieDFL-17 
Shaw, ClayRFL-22 
Barr, BobRGA-07 
Deal, NathanRGA-09 
Linder, JohnRGA-11 
Otter, C.L.RID-01 
Hyde, HenryRIL-06 
Kirk, MarkRIL-10 
Pence, MikeRIN-02 
Kerns, BrianRIN-07 
Ganske, GregRIA-04 
Latham, TomRIA-05 
Moran, JerryRKS-01 
Ryun, Jim R.RKS-02 
Tiahrt, ToddRKS-04 
Lewis, RonRKY-02 
Markey, EdDMA-07 
Camp, DaveRMI-04 
Upton, FredRMI-06 
Smith, NickRMI-07 
Rivers, LynnDMI-13 
Taylor, GeneDMS-05 
Skelton, IkeDMO-04 
Graves, SamRMO-06 
Blunt, RoyRMO-07 
Quinn, JackRNY-30 
Clayton, EvaDNC-01 
Price, DavidDNC-04 
Watt, MelDNC-12 
Portman, RobROH-02 
Tiberi, PatROH-12 
Carson, BradDOK-02 
Watkins, WesROK-03 
Watts, J.C.ROK-04 
Wu, DavidDOR-01 
Holden, TimDPA-06 
Toomey, PatRPA-15 
Pitts, JoeRPA-16 
Doyle, MikeDPA-18 
Platts, ToddRPA-19 
Wilson, JoeRSC-02 
Wamp, ZachRTN-03 
Bryant, EdRTN-07 
Johnson, SamRTX-03 
Hall, RalphRTX-04 
Barton, JoeRTX-06 
Granger, KayRTX-12 
Paul, RonRTX-14 
DeLay, TomRTX-22 
Bentsen, KenDTX-25 
Armey, DickRTX-26 
Green, GeneDTX-29 
Cantor, EricRVA-07 
Wolf, FrankRVA-10 
Inslee, JayDWA-01 
Larsen, RickDWA-02 
Dicks, NormDWA-06 
Smith, AdamDWA-09 
Rahall, NickDWV-03 
Ryan, PaulRWI-01 
Kind, RonDWI-03 
Petri, TomRWI-06