2005 Voto de la Tarjeta de Evaluaciones

Arctic Wildlife Refuge
Senado Votación Nominal 303
Tema: Perforación, Tierras/Bosques, Fauna y Flora Silvestre, Energía Sucia

The protection of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is among the highest priorities for the national environmental community. Nowhere else on our continent is the complete range of arctic and sub-arctic landscapes protected in one unbroken chain, and no other conservation area in the circumpolar north has such abundant and diverse wildlife, including rare musk oxen, polar bears, grizzlies, wolves, millions of migratory birds, and more than 120,000 caribou. The refuge's 1.5 million-acre coastal plain has been called "America's Serengeti."

Nevertheless, the Bush Administration made drilling in the Arctic Refuge a cornerstone of its national energy strategy. Stalled in the Senate by filibusters, the Administration and its allies attempted to circumvent normal legislative procedures and smuggle Arctic drilling provisions into budget bills, which have special rules and cannot be filibustered.

The Senate's fiscal year 2006 budget resolution, for example, included a provision counting revenues from drilling in the refuge. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) offered Senate Amendment 168 to strike this provision. On March 16, 2005, the Senate rejected the Cantwell amendment by a 49-51 vote (Senate roll call vote 52). YES is the pro-environment vote. On November 3, 2005, the Senate voted 52-47 to adopt S. 1932, the budget reconciliation package, which also contained language opening the refuge to oil and gas development (Senate roll call vote 303). NO is the pro-environment vote.

Fortunately, a bipartisan coalition in the House forced the removal of Arctic Refuge drilling language in the final budget reconciliation bill. Finally, in a last-ditch attempt, a provision to open the refuge was added to the Defense Appropriations conference report, which included funds for both U.S. troops and hurricane relief. Drilling opponents insisted that the drilling language be removed from the conference report. On December 21, 2005, the Senate voted 56-44 to end debate on the bill, falling short of the 60 votes necessary to move the bill forward (Senate roll call vote 364). NO is the pro-environment vote. The drilling provision was subsequently dropped, and the revised conference report was then approved by both the House and Senate, leaving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge intact.

es el
voto pro-ambientalista
Votos a Favor: 52  
Votos en Contra: 47  
No Votar: 1  
Acción a favor del ambiente
Acción en contra del ambiente
Ausencia (cuenta como negativo)
Ausencia justificada (no cuenta)
Inelegible para votar
Senador Partido Estado Voto