1997 Scorecard Vote

Animas-La Plata Irrigation Project
Senate Roll Call Vote 177
Issues: Water, Wildlife

Controversial since it was first authorized in 1968, the Bureau of Reclamation's Animas-La Plata project is one of the worst "boondoggle" western water projects ever proposed. It will cause substantial damage to fish, wildlife, and water resources in Colorado and New Mexico at huge taxpayer cost. The project will pump as much as half of the flow of the Animas River in southwestern Colorado to irrigate marginal agriculture lands at high altitude. The water will be pumped 1,000 feet uphill, consuming enough electricity to run a city of 60,000. In addition, as originally proposed, the project includes construction of two major water reservoirs, seven pumping plants, and 200 miles of canals and pipes -- all at a cost to federal taxpayers of approximately $503 million. This massive project will destroy important habitat for elk and other big game, threaten two species of endangered fish, critically deplete waterflows in the Animas and San Juan Rivers, which support a thriving multi-million-dollar rafting industry, and cause continuous water quality violations downstream in New Mexico. After years of debate and several successful lawsuits challenging the project, changes to the project are being discussed, but an alternative project has not been officially adopted.

During consideration of S. 1004, the Fiscal Year 1998 Energy and Water Development appropriations (budget) bill, Senators Russ Feingold (D-WI), Sam Brownback (R-KS), and John McCain (R-AZ) offered an amendment to halt construction of the Animas-La Plata project until the Department of the Interior reports to Congress on revising and reducing the project, and Congress authorizes a new project.

On July 15, 1997, the Senate approved Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell's (R-CO) motion to table (kill) the Feingold amendment, 56 - 42. NO is the pro-environment vote. (See House vote 10).

No
is the
pro-environment position
Votes For: 56  
Votes Against: 42  
Not Voting: 2  
Pro-environment vote
Anti-environment vote
Missed vote
Not applicable
Senator Party State Vote